How is OpenAI going to be regulated?
05/25/2023 •
OpenAI will push for regulation to secure their business position and potentially limit competition. — Majority of comments indicate suspicion towards OpenAI's push for regulation, suggesting that it might be a strategic move to secure their market position and limit competition from smaller, emerging AI systems.
Stats
| 49% | 96 | Mastodon |
| 35% | 69 | |
| 8% | 16 | Hacker News |
| 4% | 7 | 4Chan |
| 4% | 7 |
| 59% | Negative |
| 27% | Neutral |
| 14% | Positive |
| 35% | 😡 Anger |
| 31% | 😱 Fear |
| 26% | 😃 Joy |
| 5% | 😢 Sadness |
| 4% | 😯 Surprise |
| 0% | 🥰 Love |
😡
😱
😃
😢
Story
- There is a strong sentiment among some people that OpenAI is pushing for regulation primarily to secure their own business position, by monopolizing the AI industry before it fully begins, and to reduce competition, especially from smaller up-and-coming AI systems and open source alternatives.
- Some individuals believe that OpenAI's call for regulation is in order to bring in rules that would cripple up-and-coming competitors and bury them in regulatory hurdles that they can't manage.
- There is criticism about OpenAI's lack of transparency regarding the dataset used for training their models, leading to skepticism about their true stance on regulation.
- Some commenters suggest that OpenAI's push for regulations is not necessarily to safeguard humanity or align with societal expectations, but rather to subtly shape the regulatory environment to suit their own interests.
- Some people argue that the regulations being proposed by OpenAI are designed to protect large companies like Google, OpenAI, Meta, and Microsoft, rather than people or smaller businesses.
- Some believe that OpenAI's advocacy for regulation is not as sincere as they claim, citing that they may be advocating regulation just to keep competitors out.
- Many people believe that the potential risks of superintelligent AI necessitate regulation, with some comparing the need for an agency equivalent to the International Atomic Energy Agency to oversee AI and protect humanity.
- Some think that OpenAI's proposal for regulation of current AI technology is zero, and they are only talking about tech that doesn't exist.
- There is a belief among some people that AI development should be halted until societal and economic implications have been thoroughly addressed.
- A number of people also argue that any regulation should apply to OpenAI itself, and the company should not be exempt or "grandfathered in".
- There are individuals who believe that AI is wonderful and not at all threatening, thus viewing OpenAI's call for regulation as overblown.
- Some believe that OpenAI's stance on regulation is necessary to prevent potential catastrophic risks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI) and other AI technologies.
- Major open source CEOs and developers have rallied behind the sentiment of a concerted effort to regulate the development of AI technology as it approaches AGI capabilities.