No — Majority of the comments highlighted criticisms of the G20 summit's handling of the Ukraine conflict and climate change, with significant emphasis on the summit's failure to explicitly condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine and disappointment regarding softened language.
Yes — The majority of the comments suggest that Yevgeny Prigozhin had possession of Bitcoins or controlled a significant Bitcoin wallet.
The NATO summit resulted in mixed outcomes with a focus on Ukraine, sparking divisions within the alliance and a sense of disappointment and frustration, particularly from President Zelensky. However, it also had positives such as Turkey ending opposition to Sweden's NATO membership. — Majority of the viewpoints show mixed reactions ranging from disappointment and frustration to acceptance of the status quo. The positive development with Turkey and Sweden shows some successful negotiations took place.
No — Most comments criticize President Zelenskyy's actions and see them as undemocratic and oppressive, indicating general disagreement with his decision.
Prigozhin ordered the retreat to avoid unnecessary bloodshed and as part of a strategic move potentially influenced by a deal with the Kremlin. — The majority of comments point towards a strategic decision to avoid bloodshed or potentially as part of a negotiation with the Kremlin. Some suggest this could be part of larger schemes but these views are less prevalent.
Yes — While there are mixed views, a significant number of comments indicate the occurrence of an unusual activity, suggesting a possible coup. This is based on reports of Commander of Russian Wagner forces' involvement, and the advancement of Wagner forces towards Moscow.
