The G20 summit remains significant and provides an opportunity for other nations to take charge and shape outcomes, even without Xi and Putin. — The majority of the comments, despite noting the absence of Xi and Putin, highlight the ongoing significance of the summit and see their absence as an opportunity for other countries, especially from the West, to influence outcomes. While some comments underline the growing geopolitical divide, others emphasize the capacity for the summit to continue its functions and address global issues, as suggested by India's confidence in finalizing a declaration.
Yes — The majority of the comments suggest that Yevgeny Prigozhin had possession of Bitcoins or controlled a significant Bitcoin wallet.
Prigozhin ordered the retreat to avoid unnecessary bloodshed and as part of a strategic move potentially influenced by a deal with the Kremlin. — The majority of comments point towards a strategic decision to avoid bloodshed or potentially as part of a negotiation with the Kremlin. Some suggest this could be part of larger schemes but these views are less prevalent.
